You Liberals Think That ...


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2006 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 March
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
Faces of the American Dead in Iraq
Baghdad Burning - an Iraqi Blog
Common Dreams
American Civil Liberties Union
Polling Report
All About Gilbert
blogactive - Outing Political Homophobes
Party List
Dead People Server

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


Life's short,

Laugh often

Bookmark this site!


Protestors and Police
08.31.04 (3:32 pm)   [edit]
I just saw this article from the AP.  Whether or not the people deserved being arrested is immaterial - although my guess is the PD is looking for excuses...  

Being so much in the spotlight, the NYC Police need to ensure that everyone arrested is treated as fairly and humanely as possible. 

First of all it will help prevent tensions from spiraling out of control. 

Secondly, if we are the greatest nation in the world, then they need to show it in NY as well as Iraq (etc.) by behaving like representatives of a civilized government.  When people are treated with animosity and contempt, then you can only expect them to return that treatment with more of the same..... 

[i]Published on Tuesday, August 31, 2004 by the [url=http://www.ap.org/]Associated Press[/url] [/i]

[b]Protesters, Lawyers Criticize Convention Arrests[/b]

NEW YORK -- Protesters arrested for demonstrating against the Republican National Convention had been manhandled by police and were kept in a dingy holding facility for as long as 30 hours without adequate legal representation, according to attorneys with the National Lawyers Guild.

Members of the guild held a press conference Monday alleging that police had prevented arrestees from consulting with lawyers and that some were held beyond the legal limit of 24 hours before being brought before a judge or issued a summons.

Yetta Kurland, a guild member, said reports of mistreatment of protesters included a complaint that an eight-week pregnant woman had not been given food or drink and a complaint that a woman with a broken foot was among five detained women daisy chained together.

Protesters and lawyers volunteering as legal observers to oversee protesters' rights said officers had treated them roughly, and complained about conditions at Pier 57, a former parking garage where arrestees are processed.

"I was heavily thrown to the ground - although I did have my legal observer hat on - by a police officer," observer Simone Levine said at the press conference.

Some protesters said there were only two portable toilets at the pier and that holding pens were circled with razor wire.

Since protests began Thursday, 548 people have been arrested, mostly on misdemeanor charges.

City Councilman Charles Barron said he was outraged that lawyers were being prevented from meeting with arrested protesters.

He also complained about police use of nets to trap and then arrest protesters.

"We're not animals," he said.

In a statement, NYPD spokesman Paul Browne said officers had been "restrained and professional throughout. The single largest factor in delaying the release of arrested demonstrators is their refusal to identify themselves."

Contrary to some protesters' accounts, Browne said those arrested had been allowed to make telephone calls.

© 2004 Copyright Associated
 
Broken Record Time Again
08.27.04 (2:10 pm)   [edit]

I know it was only on the 24th the last time I said something, but I don't care.


Today is August 27th at 3pm Central time - just three days later - and the number of Americans Killed in Iraq is now 974.  I am appalled by that number.  Further, nowhere in the headlines have I seen anything about this. 


Instead, we're consumed with What John Kerry did and didn't do in Vietnam and who's going to be unruly in NYC.  As always, I'm certain that they're waiting for the nice round sexy 1000 until it becomes news agains.


And, yes, yes, yes, I know, people die in wars and these soldiers volunteered and isn't the world better off without Saddam Hussein and blah, blah, blah .... Be that as it may, don't we owe it to these men and women to publically acknowledge them and publically mourn them and try to do everything we can to stop adding more people into their ranks?

 
GOP Delegates Met With Anti-Bush Signs
08.25.04 (11:39 am)   [edit]

Now, I know that numerous protesters are heading to New York to protest - that's not really what this is about.  All I can say about this article is, "by holding their convention in a city that overwhelmingly votes Democrat in presidential elections, did the Republicans expect anything less?"


 


Published on Wednesday, August 25, 2004 by the Associated Press


GOP Delegates Met With Anti-Bush Signs


 


by Sara Kugler


NEW YORK - In case their discontent isn't already clear, protesters are spelling it out. "Stop Bush Now" signs and other anti-GOP messages are appearing throughout the city well before delegates arrive for the Republican National Convention, which begins Monday.


Bright blue tarps, painted with glaring yellow letters, are going up on dozens of rooftops in Brooklyn, under the flight paths into busy New York airports. Thousands of delegates and convention guests peering down at the city might see messages like "No more years" and "Re-defeat Bush."


"We just hope that they'll look down and ask themselves, 'Why, why do they feel so strongly? Why is it that New York feels this way?'" said Genevieve Christy, who has painted more than 80 banners since thinking of the idea a few weeks ago.


The movement is so popular in her neighborhood that Christy, a 57-year-old consultant, is putting orders on a waiting list. She even brought supplies with her on vacation so she could keep working.


The banners and signs, Christy said, are a form of safe, silent protest that many New Yorkers prefer over the dozens of rallies planned throughout the week of the convention.


Five blocks from convention headquarters at Madison Square Garden, where President Bush is to be nominated Sept. 2, a 25-by-75-foot banner screams "Save America. Defeat Bush."


The sign hangs from the offices of the Unite Here union, which represents 440,000 workers from various industries, including hospitality, gaming and textiles.


It's not just the views from above that are being used. For months, protest groups have been slapping stickers and posters on subway platforms, train cars, traffic signs, park benches, light poles and anywhere else they can find space.


GOP convention spokesman Leonardo Alcivar did not return calls for comment.


One group, called the No RNC Poster Project, has printed tens of thousands of posters to distribute throughout the city. Other groups have created Web sites advocating their poster movements.


"Let no Republican look anywhere in this city without seeing our message," says one site, promoting an image of a black "W" inside a red circle with a slash through it. "Let's make the entire city our canvas and let the RNC know that they've grossly miscalculated their choice of venue."


Thomas Gallagher, a 35-year-old graphic artist, printed 3,000 fire-engine-red posters with white letters that proclaim, "World Says No to Bush." Hundreds have gone up in parts of Brooklyn and Queens and throughout Manhattan.


"The Republicans have made a huge mistake in coming here, so the idea of the signs was to get these up all over the place so you create a buzz ... that New York is not with them and does not support this candidate at all," Gallagher said.


Norman Isaacs, who owns a record store on Cooper Square in the East Village, was eager to send that message to Republicans who might wander by.


"Hopefully," Isaacs said, "they'll get the impression that not all of America is with them."


© Copyright 2004 Associated Press

 
Who Cares if I'm a Broken Record?
08.24.04 (9:38 am)   [edit]

I know that my last few posts have pretty much been on the same topic, but I don't care.  There are now 966 American Soldiers killed in Iraq.  Since the 'transfer of sovereignty' 57 days ago, 112 have died.  That is an average of 2 people per day and does not include Iraqis or any other nations' soldiers. 


The worst part about it is that the American media is too focused on Olympics and minutiae like who was and was not being shot at on the Mekong Delta in 1968 ....


Is that our priority?  Are dead soldiers not 'sexy' enough to rate being reported?  Are the news rooms waiting for a nice round number like 1000 before talking about it?  At the rate these men and women are dieing, that will be September 15th.  But at least it they won't tarnish the Republican Convention or intrude upon our Labor Day picnics.

 
Returning to the Bad Old Days
08.20.04 (7:02 am)   [edit]
I've been hearing more and more about this type of intimidation by the FBI.  These are not new tactics - they're Civil Rights/Vietnam era tactics that were supposedly stopped in the '70's.... Since we're back to a polarized era where the Left and the Right are at such odds, it doesn't surprise me that the Right controlled federal government is pulling old tricks out and dusting them off

I hate that the country has come to this, again.  This is one thing that I place blame solely upon the Administration - there is no reason to use scare tactics against your opponents.  While there may well be groups intending to cause trouble during the RNC, using blanket tactics against all oppostion groups is so far from being the right answer that I'm surprised even the Neo-cons think it's a good idea....

[i]Published on Thursday, August 19, 2004 by the Denver Post[/i]

[b]FBI Tactics Erode Public's Trust[/b]

It's disconcerting to hear that federal agents are making unannounced visits to people's homes for little chats with citizens who might consider expressing some sort of dissent at the upcoming Republican National Convention.

The Justice Department says its goal is to preempt disruptive protests "of a criminal nature" at the New York convention, which starts Aug. 30. They have gone about their mission aggressively, with little regard for basic rights and without evidence that the people they are trying to dissuade are actually intending any criminal activity.

Thousands of protesters plan to march in opposition to the war in Iraq before or during the convention. Others plan to demonstrate for or against other causes.

Recent FBI bulletins about anti-war protests have urged local police to be alert and report "potentially illegal acts" to federal terrorism task forces. Justice Department officials know the potentially insidious impact of their spying: "Given the limited nature of such public monitoring, any possible 'chilling' effect caused by the bulletins would be quite minimal and substantially outweighed by the public interest in maintaining safety and order during large-scale demonstrations," according to a department memo.

In the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, concerns spread that the government might use counterterrorism efforts as an excuse to ignore Americans' civil rights. Those concerns became front and center as agents made surprise visits to people's homes and sent "scruffy-looking" agents to infiltrate protest-organizing meetings.

Three members of Congress have called for the Justice Department to investigate the FBI tactics, saying they appeared to represent "systematic political harassment and intimidation of legitimate antiwar protesters."

People associated with three activist groups in Colorado have been questioned by FBI agents. FBI spokesman Joe Parris in Washington says the bureau is interviewing people "that we have reason to think are in a position to have knowledge of plans to commit disruptive acts of a criminal nature."

But the inquiries don't really seem designed to root out criminals. Would-be protesters in Denver, Fort Collins and elsewhere who have been questioned say they feel the FBI is trying to cow them into not demonstrating. A 21-year-old intern with the American Friends Service Committee, a Quaker public service group that once won the Nobel Peace Prize, says she and her friends were questioned even though they have no plans to go to New York.
ACLU attorney Mark Silverstein said federal agents are operating in plain sight, typically marching up to someone's door with a clipboard of information and photographs of their targets in hand.

Ironically, Denver recently settled a lawsuit accusing the police of unlawfully keeping intelligence files on people and organizations involved in legal protests. Denver agreed to keep such files only where there was a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. Silverstein said two Denver police officers are involved in the federal Joint Terrorism Task Force questioning.

Despite the FBI effort, protests will surely go on, and some demonstrators will be arrested. But the damage will come in the longer run as trust in the government erodes and as people silence themselves just so they won't become part of an FBI spy file
 
At the Risk of Sounding Like a Broken Record
08.19.04 (12:37 pm)   [edit]

I just looked for an update and the death toll in Iraq has risen to 952 American Soldiers.


That number just horrifies me. 


The first anti-war protest I attended was in 2002.  I thought going to Iraq was wrong then.  I thought it was wrong last March.  I think it's wrong now.


 

 
Was it Only a Week Ago?
08.18.04 (7:05 am)   [edit]

I was just looking back a few posts and it was only 8 days ago that 932 American Soldiers had died in Iraq.  Now, a dozen more mean and women are dead.  The new death toll is 944.


On a related note, my brother was activated this past Sunday for a training period before being sent to Iraq for the second time.  He fought in the first was on Iraq - I really hope he can survive this second one as well.

 
The Times, They are A-Changin'
08.13.04 (7:47 am)   [edit]

In the mid-80's when I was a college student and just coming out, the American culture was not very supportive of gay people.  The AIDS hysteria was at it's height and it was still considered a 'gay' disease that many thought we deserved.  The military and federal gov't was still arguing that gay people are security threats.  The Moral Majority seemed to be everywhere.


Initially I became a gay activist.  I protested.  I wrote letters to politicians.  I did the things that I was 'supposed' to do as a good little liberal activist and encountered a lot of hate in the process.  After a couple years, I stopped being so politically active - many activists are too intense to be around ALL the time.  But since I had come out already I still encountered the hatred. 


It's easy to build up a tough exterior to keep all the bad things at bay.  It's much harder to look at the world without using the filter that exterior provides. 


I was astounded when the gay marriage debate flaired up.  How could we have moved forward so far that marriage is even on the mainstream political radar?  The sodomy law in Texas had just been invalidated the previous summer.


But, looking on CNN today, in response to the news about James McGreevey, (you know, NJ Governor resigning over having an affair with a man) CNN did a quickvote question asking whether or not people would vote for a gay politician.  Of 154,000 responses, 67% answered yes.


Now, I know that poll is not statistically valid as it's only the viewpoint of internet users (from whatever country) that read CNN.com and choose to participate.  That said, my filter tells me that 67% is astoundingly high even for that faux demographic.


Perhaps public opinion has actually changed.  Perhaps my Reagan-era opinions are obsolete.  Maybe social issues have continued to move forward and I just failed to notice.


I certainly hope so.

 
Preaching to the Choir
08.12.04 (11:07 am)   [edit]

I've read various articles and commentaries about the Bush campaign only allowing people to hear political speeches if they are Republican party members and/or sign statements that they will vote for Bush/Cheney in November.  I've also read about keeping protestors far out of sight.


What I haven't seen are similar stories about the Kerry campaign.  (well, beyond the free speech concentration camp set up at the convention, that is ...)  So, I wonder if both parties are doing this and I just missed those articles or whether it's predominately a one sided thing.


As a secondary question, why are they doing this?  (other than the obvious desire to look on the evening news)  Isn't the whole purpose behind stumping around the country during a campaign to convince voters that your vision of the future is the one they should back?  Have we progressed to the point where it's more important for a candidate to look good for the media than for the people who actually want to hear what a candidate has to say?  Am I being old fashioned and naive?

 
The Frozen Rose of Texas
08.12.04 (9:16 am)   [edit]

Ok, talking about the weather may not be the most interesting form of small talk, but I’m going to do it anyway….


 


Yesterday evening I went outside and it felt chilly when the wind blew.  It was in the mid 70’s.  This morning, it was 62 when I left for work and I considered grabbing a jacket on my way out the door.  The average August temp in Dallas is 86 – there are often evenings that it’s still in the 80’s around midnight.


 

This is odd to me.  I grew up in Michigan where 86 is close to melting.  On the other hand, about 10 days from now is the 20th anniversary of the date I moved to Texas for college.  I guess I’m not a real Midwesterner anymore …. I’m now a naturalized Texan and have just had another reminder that I’m more acclimated to my adopted home than I think …
 
What To Do With My Poor Kitty ...
08.11.04 (8:26 am)   [edit]

We reached a decision on what to do about my kitty.


To back up to last Friday, once Gilbert was done being mad about the cat peeing again and I was done being upset over him bitching at me, we had a very good conversation and sorted things out.  It comes down to this: 


Boris is getting old.  He’s beginning to show signs of an onset of a feline dementia which may or may not be a symptom of his hyper-thyroid condition.  From that, the vet thinks he’s developing separation anxiety and the peeing is just a manifestation of that.  Our choices, as we see them are to either lock him up at night and whenever we’re away or have someone stay home with him – neither of which is a good answer.


So, I found a no-kill shelter that has a program for geriatric cats that is willing to take him.  I’m surrendering him tonight.  Luckily, I will be able to visit him but I’m still entering a mourning period.  I cried last night as I cuddled him – I’m sure I’ll cry again tonight when I give him up.


I’ve had Boris since he was small enough to fit in the palm of my hand.  I’m going to miss him and I hope this is the best thing to do for him….


Geoffrey's Note:  This post has, by far, generated the highest number of comments of anything I've put in here this year.  I'm a big part of that by responding to comments - but, considering some of the political stuff I've posted, I'm surprised this one is the hot button issue .....

 
Casualties Keep Mounting
08.10.04 (9:42 am)   [edit]

As of today, August 10, there have been 932 American Soldiers killed in Iraq.  The last time I mentioned the number of dead was on July 23rd where the number was 906. 


At that time I was complaining about the average of 2 Americans killed each day since the alleged handover of sovereignty occurred.  Since then, 26 more Americans have died.  (this number is, of course, ignoring the non-American soldiers and civilians killed in the same period)  So, the average over the past 18 days is 'down' to 1.5.


That means only 3 American Soldiers have been killed every two days for the past 2 and a half weeks.  I'm not sure what is worse - that the dead keep mounting or that the mainstream media is more concerned with other matters.  What are they waiting for - the number of dead to hit a nice round number? 

 
I'm Not Sure What to Do
08.06.04 (12:40 pm)   [edit]

Gilbert's pissed off at me.


The Cat peed on the sofa again.  (which has become a regular occurence)  I hate it too and I've tried the cat-away spray stuff, i've taken him to the doctor and learned about his hyper-thyroid condition .. but he's still doing it. 


I've tried everything the vet suggested and everything I could find online - now I'm out of ideas.


He's 15, has a hyper-thyroid and a urination problem so finding a new home would be difficult.  I don't want to take him to have him euthanized.  But I don't want him to argue about him anymore ....


I don't know what to do.

 
President Bush - Steadfast in His Convictions
08.06.04 (8:38 am)   [edit]


This was emailed to me without a proper by-line so it's either now part of the public domain, or I'm a plaigarist.  Either way, I felt free to rearrange it to follow my own preference .....


 


My  favorite is...

"The most important thing is for us to find Osama Bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
- George W. Bush, Sept. 13, 2001

"I don't know where he is. I have no idea, and I really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002


George W. Bush - Steadfast in his Convictions


The next time someone criticizes John Kerry for being a flip-flopper, remind them that:




  • Bush was against campaign finance reform; now he's for it.


  • Bush was against a Homeland Security Department; now he's for it.


  • Bush was against a 9/11 commission; now he's for it.


  • Bush was against an Iraq WMD investigation; now he's for it.


  • Bush was against nation building; now he's for it.


  • Bush was against deficits; now he's for them.


  • Bush was for free trade; then he was for tariffs on steel, and now he's against them again.


  • Bush was for states' rights to decide on gay marriage; now he is for changing the Constitution to outlaw gay marriage.


  • Bush said he would provide money for first responders (fire, police, emergency); then he doesn't.


  • Bush said that "help is on the way" to the military; then he cuts their benefits and health care.


  • Bush opposed the U.S. negotiating with North Korea; now he supports it.


  • Bush was against Ba'ath party members holding office or government jobs in Iraq; now he's for it.


  • Bush said he is the "education president;" then he refused to fund key education programs.

  • Bush said that him being governor of Texas for six years was enough political experience to be president of the U.S.; then he criticized Sen. John Edwards for not having enough experience after Edwards had served six years in the U.S. Senate.
 
Let the Office Gossip Begin
08.06.04 (8:01 am)   [edit]

Thursday is typically Layoff day here at Ericsson.


Yesterday, (which was a Thursday) my boss came and got me for my semi-annual review (which I always hate doing - but that's not the point).  The guy that sits next to me saw us heading toward a conference room with a packet of papers.


His first thought was 'Oh, Shit!  They're getting rid of Geoffrey!'  Now part of me is flattered that he would be upset about me being let go.  More of me wishes I had scheduled Friday as a day off so that I could have left after the review and really got the office gossip churning.

 
What A Great Word!!!
08.06.04 (7:05 am)   [edit]

I don't want to start a word of the day thing as that can quickly become pretty lame.  However, sometimes I just have to share new finds out of the treasure trove that is the English Language.  This may prove to be a better word than 'Wal-Martian' simply because I know more people that fit into this category and will be able to use it more often:


fauxhemian


(FOH.hee.mee.un) adj. Relating to something that is bohemian in a fake or pretentious manner. —n. A middle class or wealthy person who affects a countercultural lifestyle. Also: faux-hemian.
 
Must be a Full Moon - The Freaks are Coming Out
08.04.04 (2:33 pm)   [edit]
This guy definitely wins the Political Throwback-To-A-Scarier-Ti me Award of the Week. Check out his website - it's pretty appalling.


[i]Published on Wednesday, August 4, 2004 by [url=http://news.independent.co.uk...]the lndependent/UK [/url][/i]
[b]Republican Candidate Admits Supporting Eugenics

by Amber McDowell in Nashville, Tennessee[/b]

The Republican congressional candidate [url=http://www.jameshartforcongre...]James L Hart [/url] has acknowledged that he is an unapologetic supporter of eugenics, the fake science that resulted in thousands of people being sterilized in an attempt to purify the white race.

He believes the country will look "like one big Detroit" - which has a large African-American population - if it doesn't eliminate welfare payments and immigration. He believes that if blacks were integrated centuries ago, the automobile would never have been invented.

Mr Hart has been said to turn up at voters' homes wearing a bulletproof vest and carrying a gun, telling them that "white children deserve the same rights as everyone else".

But, despite his radical views, Mr Hart may end up winning the Republican nomination in a north-western Tennessee district because he is the only Republican candidate on the ballot in tomorrow's primary. His presence in the campaign has embarrassed Republican leaders, who were blind-sided by Mr Hart after they didn't bother fielding a candidate. John Tanner, a Democrat, has held the seat for 15 years.

"I would characterize him as a racist, an elitist," said Dennis Bertrand, a financial analyst and former military officer who also stood as a candidate. "His idea of ... genetically altering the human race in order to build a super race with super intelligence is appalling."

Much of Mr Hart's platform revolves around eugenics, which developed before the Second World War as a pseudoscientific movement to solve social problems by preventing the "unfit" from having children. It inspired 33 US states to pass laws that allowed the sterilization of some 65,000 people, and Nazi Germany used the US examples to justify programs that sterilized and killed millions.

Mr Hart, a 60-year-old estate agent, knows his views on eugenics are far from the mainstream and knows he is viewed as racist by most people. But he insists his beliefs have nothing to do with racism and everything to do with "favored races" from Europe and Asia and "less-favored races" from Africa. To achieve his goal of a country populated by "favored races," Mr Hart proposes eliminating welfare and immigration.

"If an individual demonstrates the ability to produce and contribute to society, he or she would be encouraged to have more children. People on welfare would not," Mr Hart said.

Mr Bertrand said he found out about Mr Hart's views from the internet, where he went to learn more about the race in Tennessee's 8th District, which covers the mostly rural counties of north-west Tennessee, stretching from north Memphis to Clarksville. He says he is running to make sure Mr Hart does not win the Republican Party's endorsement.

"I was appalled by what I'd seen there," Mr Bertrand said. "It had nothing to do with the beliefs I have, or of any Republican I know - or any Democrat or independent."
 

All About Geoffrey Snyder

I am a 40yo guy living in Dallas, Texas with my partner of 18 years, Gilbert, and our puppy, Rex. I'm both a fun loving, happy guy in my everyday life and a loud mouthed Progressive.

I love to travel and meet people. My goal in life is to go everywhere and meet everyone.

So, pull up a chair, make yourself at home, enjoy my mental wanderings and feel free to drop me a line to tell me what you think...