Evolution vs. Intelligent Design


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2006 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 March
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
Faces of the American Dead in Iraq
Baghdad Burning - an Iraqi Blog
Common Dreams
American Civil Liberties Union
Polling Report
All About Gilbert
blogactive - Outing Political Homophobes
Party List
Dead People Server

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


Life's short,

Laugh often

Bookmark this site!


Evolution vs. Intelligent Design
08.05.05 (10:39 am)   [edit]

It seems that every time I turn around there is another report about the battle between Evolution, Creationism and Intelligent Design. 


Personally, I think the concept of Creationism is absurd.  I do not for a moment believe that creation story in Genesis is a factual account of what happened.  There was no ‘Poof!’ and there everything was.  I think the creation stories passed down to us from our various cultural ancestors were a way for early man to explain how things came into existence.  I look at thunder as being the anger of the gods this same way. 


Evolution is a scientific theory attempting to explain how life came to exist in the forms we see today. 


Intelligent Design is a religious'political theory attempting to explain who caused life to exist in the forms we see today.  Essentially, they are trying to say that something happened to create life, but life is so complex that it’s obvious someone had to be designing some portions – that these things could never have occurred by trial and error. 


One of the methods used to justify Intelligent Design as a science is by explaining everything that scientists cannot yet explain as being proof of intercession by a designer.  The absence of an explanation cannot be used as proof of intent.  That assumes that there are only two possible explanations and if something isn’t one then it must be the other.  Essentially, if science hasn't explained something then it must have a religious answer.


Intelligent Design pretends to be science but cannot be a scientific position because it’s not measurable nor is it reproducible.  As such, it has no room in scientific textbooks or science classes.  Its proper place is in the realm of religion and philosophy.


For the Regressive Right that is not acceptable.  The whole purpose for the debate is that Evolution contradicts Creationism - which is Correct and True.  Intelligent Design is a thinly disguised veil over Creationism that, purely for political purposes, is being pushed by Christian extremists.  They’re trying to appear moderate to people who believe in God and think that evolution could be just a way of explaining how He/She/It did it. 


Now, just because one believes in Evolution does not mean they do not believe in God.  I believe in God and I believe Evolution more accurately explains the origins of life than any other theory.  What I don’t believe is the fundamentalist stance that each and every word in the bible has been written by God and is the literal truth – it is instead a collection of writings and oral histories done by numerous humans. 

 


posted by: JimBrodhead (reply)
post date: 08.05.05 (8:52 am)

good stuff here. i'm going to have to come back and read some more. thanks for the effort you put into your work.



posted by: DrForbush (reply)
post date: 08.05.05 (8:55 am)

I like what Al Franken said yesterday on his radio show about Bush saying that Intellegent Design and Evolution should be taught side by side. He said that we should also teach students that some people choose to use "ain't" as well as the formal "is not."

I also posted another comment along these same lines where I said that we should teach Astrology alongside these two as well. After all, some people think they can predict the future with Astrology. That certainly could come in handy, don't you think?

In fact, why should we stop there? Why not have "Crazy Day" where we just teach all kinds of crazy ideas? Maybe it should be "crazy week" or even "crazy month," because we do have a lot of crazy ideas out there, life UFOs, ghosts, Paul Bunyon and Magic...

Your Name:


Your Comment:


All About Geoffrey Snyder

I am a 40yo guy living in Dallas, Texas with my partner of 18 years, Gilbert, and our puppy, Rex. I'm both a fun loving, happy guy in my everyday life and a loud mouthed Progressive.

I love to travel and meet people. My goal in life is to go everywhere and meet everyone.

So, pull up a chair, make yourself at home, enjoy my mental wanderings and feel free to drop me a line to tell me what you think...